Comparison of appearance
The surface of Skyworth Q+ box adopts a polished mirror design. The millet box uses a frosted design. The mirror design looks more beautiful and upscale, but it is prone to scratches. The matte design is not beautiful but more practical, this can only be seen Personal hobby.
The size of the Skyworth Q+ box is generally one lap larger than that of the millet box, especially the thickness is almost twice that of the millet box. This is mainly due to the reason why the Skyworth Q+ box has been added to the net port, but in fact the Skyworth Q+ box is also very Small.
The bottom of Skyworth's Q+ box and millet box has a rubber pad, both of which are good in this detail.
Both interfaces are also centrally located on the back of the box. There is an AV port, an HDMI port, a USB port, a Micro USB port, and a power port. The difference is that the Skyworth Q+ box has one more Ethernet port, and the Xiaomi box has one more Micro SD card slot. In this respect, I personally think that the Skyworth Q+ box Ethernet port is more practical, and it can also adapt to more network environments. Although there are basically WiFi networks in the home, plugging in directly into the Ethernet port will provide a more stable network, which should be more convenient for some elderly people.
Finally, look at the two boxes of remote control, you can see the two mobile phones are basically the same, except that Skyworth Q+ box has a Q key. The back of the millet box remote control is flat, Skyworth Q+ box made a curved handle, slightly better grip than the millet box.
Skyworth Q+ box remote control uses two 7-battery power supplies. The millet box remote control uses buttons for electronic power supply. The corresponding cost will be higher than the normal battery cost. This is also why the Skyworth Q+'s remote control is thicker than the millet box.
System comparison
Now the appearance of the box is basically the same, here is simple to bring, in fact, a box is good or bad, the most important thing is to look at its system and content resources, the following picture left is Skyworth box, the right picture is the box of millet . The Skyworth Q+ box uses the CIBN's broadcast control platform. The function options in the main interface are all centralized and placed at the bottom of the interface. The millet box trial is the ICNTV broadcast control platform. The main interface displays the function options in the form of cards.
Both boxes are very rich in content resources. Skyworth's Q+ box is supported by Tencent Video. Millet Box has US$1 billion investment in the major video alliance. Content updates are also relatively timely, but both of them are charged. The content is also in the minority. So in terms of content, the two are basically similar.
The application of Skyworth Q+ box has been centralized into the “apply†option, and the application installed by the millet box has been placed on the right side of the main interface. The personal feeling of the interface of the millet box looks more intuitive and convenient. quick selection.
For installed applications, Skyworth Q+ boxes can only perform simple set-up and unmount operations. In addition to the millet boxes can be freely moved and unloaded, the application can be grouped. In this respect, the millet box is more humane than the Skyworth Q+ box. Change.
The Skyworth Q+ box's setup interface has also been card-styled, which looks more beautiful, but the setting interface of the millet box is concise and clear, making it easier to find what you need to set up. So, here we need to look at personal preferences. Do you prefer a beautiful interface or are you more inclined to be concise?
Skyworth's Q+ box supports 1080P resolution, while Xiaomi's box can support 4K resolution. Of course, your home TV needs to support 4K resolution. At present, the 1080P resolution box can basically satisfy family needs. At this point, Xiaomi's box is stronger than Skyworth's Q+ box.
To get the box, we definitely need to install some application software, because of the lack of application store resources, so we need to install some of their own applications. Skyworth Q+ box can only be installed and installed through U disk. In addition to supporting U disk installation, Xiaomi box can also be installed remotely and installed quickly through screen shot artifacts. At this point, Skyworth's Q+ box still has a lot to learn.
Through the information displayed on the box “About†interface, we can clearly see that the Skyworth Q+ box has one more wired network card address (Ethernet port) than the Xiaomi box, and the Xiaomi box has one more Bluetooth function than the Skyworth Q+ box. In the end it is important whether Bluetooth or Ethernet port, I personally prefer Bluetooth, because the addition of Bluetooth can make the box more playable.
Skyworth box Q+ uses AMLOGIC S805 Cortex-A5 quad-core 1.5GHz CPU, Mali450 GPU, millet box uses AMLOGIC S812 Cortex-A9 quad-core 2.0GHz CPU, Mali450 MP6 GPU, the overall performance of the millet box compared to Skyworth box Q+ A grade higher.
Through the comparison of some "system parameters", we can see that the two are the same in the kernel architecture, version and system version, Skyworth Q+ box is 1GB DDR3 running memory and 8GB flash memory, and millet box enhanced version (2G enhanced version ) Runs 2GB of DDR3 memory and 4GB of flash memory. Running a larger box of millet on memory can ensure the smooth running of the system, while the Skyworth Q+ box is larger in storage, but the millet box can perform memory expansion.
Skyworth Q+ box adopts dual-channel WiFi design, and Xiaomi box supports 2.4GHz/5GHz dual-band WiFi. Here's a simple test of the WiFi signal strength in the next two boxes. Both boxes are connected to the same WiFi signal. Skyworth Q+ box The signal strength is -54dBm, and the signal strength of the millet box is -63dBm. It is clear that the Skyworth Q+ box with dual-channel WiFi is better. In the aspect of WiFi network signal, Skyworth Q+ box needs some more than the millet box, although the millet box supports 5GHz WiFi, but unless your box and routing are in the same room, because the 5G signal through the wall is really bad.
summary
In general, Skyworth Q+ network set-top boxes are slightly inferior to the enhanced version of the millet box in terms of hardware configuration. The Skyworth Q+ box has one more Ethernet port and 4G storage space than the enhanced version of the millet box, and the signal strength is even stronger in the WiFi network. Higher, the enhanced version of the millet box has one more Bluetooth function than the Skyworth Q+ box, and it is also better in terms of system optimization. In terms of content resources, the gap between the two is not significant. Skyworth Q+ has Tencent video support, and Xiaomi Box has a video alliance of 1 billion US dollars to create the backing of the video. In the end how to choose, in fact, depends on how individual needs. Personally feel that if you For the elderly in the home, it is better to choose a Skyworth Q+ box that is more affordable and supports the Ethernet port; if it is used by young people, of course, it is a higher-selection box that also supports Bluetooth. , play games or expand the box is very convenient.
The surface of Skyworth Q+ box adopts a polished mirror design. The millet box uses a frosted design. The mirror design looks more beautiful and upscale, but it is prone to scratches. The matte design is not beautiful but more practical, this can only be seen Personal hobby.
The size of the Skyworth Q+ box is generally one lap larger than that of the millet box, especially the thickness is almost twice that of the millet box. This is mainly due to the reason why the Skyworth Q+ box has been added to the net port, but in fact the Skyworth Q+ box is also very Small.
The bottom of Skyworth's Q+ box and millet box has a rubber pad, both of which are good in this detail.
Both interfaces are also centrally located on the back of the box. There is an AV port, an HDMI port, a USB port, a Micro USB port, and a power port. The difference is that the Skyworth Q+ box has one more Ethernet port, and the Xiaomi box has one more Micro SD card slot. In this respect, I personally think that the Skyworth Q+ box Ethernet port is more practical, and it can also adapt to more network environments. Although there are basically WiFi networks in the home, plugging in directly into the Ethernet port will provide a more stable network, which should be more convenient for some elderly people.
Finally, look at the two boxes of remote control, you can see the two mobile phones are basically the same, except that Skyworth Q+ box has a Q key. The back of the millet box remote control is flat, Skyworth Q+ box made a curved handle, slightly better grip than the millet box.
Skyworth Q+ box remote control uses two 7-battery power supplies. The millet box remote control uses buttons for electronic power supply. The corresponding cost will be higher than the normal battery cost. This is also why the Skyworth Q+'s remote control is thicker than the millet box.
System comparison
Now the appearance of the box is basically the same, here is simple to bring, in fact, a box is good or bad, the most important thing is to look at its system and content resources, the following picture left is Skyworth box, the right picture is the box of millet . The Skyworth Q+ box uses the CIBN's broadcast control platform. The function options in the main interface are all centralized and placed at the bottom of the interface. The millet box trial is the ICNTV broadcast control platform. The main interface displays the function options in the form of cards.
Both boxes are very rich in content resources. Skyworth's Q+ box is supported by Tencent Video. Millet Box has US$1 billion investment in the major video alliance. Content updates are also relatively timely, but both of them are charged. The content is also in the minority. So in terms of content, the two are basically similar.
The application of Skyworth Q+ box has been centralized into the “apply†option, and the application installed by the millet box has been placed on the right side of the main interface. The personal feeling of the interface of the millet box looks more intuitive and convenient. quick selection.
For installed applications, Skyworth Q+ boxes can only perform simple set-up and unmount operations. In addition to the millet boxes can be freely moved and unloaded, the application can be grouped. In this respect, the millet box is more humane than the Skyworth Q+ box. Change.
The Skyworth Q+ box's setup interface has also been card-styled, which looks more beautiful, but the setting interface of the millet box is concise and clear, making it easier to find what you need to set up. So, here we need to look at personal preferences. Do you prefer a beautiful interface or are you more inclined to be concise?
Skyworth's Q+ box supports 1080P resolution, while Xiaomi's box can support 4K resolution. Of course, your home TV needs to support 4K resolution. At present, the 1080P resolution box can basically satisfy family needs. At this point, Xiaomi's box is stronger than Skyworth's Q+ box.
To get the box, we definitely need to install some application software, because of the lack of application store resources, so we need to install some of their own applications. Skyworth Q+ box can only be installed and installed through U disk. In addition to supporting U disk installation, Xiaomi box can also be installed remotely and installed quickly through screen shot artifacts. At this point, Skyworth's Q+ box still has a lot to learn.
Through the information displayed on the box “About†interface, we can clearly see that the Skyworth Q+ box has one more wired network card address (Ethernet port) than the Xiaomi box, and the Xiaomi box has one more Bluetooth function than the Skyworth Q+ box. In the end it is important whether Bluetooth or Ethernet port, I personally prefer Bluetooth, because the addition of Bluetooth can make the box more playable.
Skyworth box Q+ uses AMLOGIC S805 Cortex-A5 quad-core 1.5GHz CPU, Mali450 GPU, millet box uses AMLOGIC S812 Cortex-A9 quad-core 2.0GHz CPU, Mali450 MP6 GPU, the overall performance of the millet box compared to Skyworth box Q+ A grade higher.
Through the comparison of some "system parameters", we can see that the two are the same in the kernel architecture, version and system version, Skyworth Q+ box is 1GB DDR3 running memory and 8GB flash memory, and millet box enhanced version (2G enhanced version ) Runs 2GB of DDR3 memory and 4GB of flash memory. Running a larger box of millet on memory can ensure the smooth running of the system, while the Skyworth Q+ box is larger in storage, but the millet box can perform memory expansion.
Skyworth Q+ box adopts dual-channel WiFi design, and Xiaomi box supports 2.4GHz/5GHz dual-band WiFi. Here's a simple test of the WiFi signal strength in the next two boxes. Both boxes are connected to the same WiFi signal. Skyworth Q+ box The signal strength is -54dBm, and the signal strength of the millet box is -63dBm. It is clear that the Skyworth Q+ box with dual-channel WiFi is better. In the aspect of WiFi network signal, Skyworth Q+ box needs some more than the millet box, although the millet box supports 5GHz WiFi, but unless your box and routing are in the same room, because the 5G signal through the wall is really bad.
summary
In general, Skyworth Q+ network set-top boxes are slightly inferior to the enhanced version of the millet box in terms of hardware configuration. The Skyworth Q+ box has one more Ethernet port and 4G storage space than the enhanced version of the millet box, and the signal strength is even stronger in the WiFi network. Higher, the enhanced version of the millet box has one more Bluetooth function than the Skyworth Q+ box, and it is also better in terms of system optimization. In terms of content resources, the gap between the two is not significant. Skyworth Q+ has Tencent video support, and Xiaomi Box has a video alliance of 1 billion US dollars to create the backing of the video. In the end how to choose, in fact, depends on how individual needs. Personally feel that if you For the elderly in the home, it is better to choose a Skyworth Q+ box that is more affordable and supports the Ethernet port; if it is used by young people, of course, it is a higher-selection box that also supports Bluetooth. , play games or expand the box is very convenient.
Roof De-Icing Heat Film is mainly for Snow Melting Mat,Anti-Freeze,Reduce risk and save time by installing snow & ice melting systems on your roof or gutters,snow melting around chimney,snow melting fast on roof,snow melting ideas,snow melting machine used in boston,snow melting materials,snow melting salt replacements,snow melting services,roof gutter de-icing kit,roof de-icing system,roof de icing products.mats,flat roof de icing system,roof deicing tape,heat roof snow de-icing kit,flat.metal roof de-icing,diy roof de-icing,thermal technologies roof de icing system,easy heat roof de icing,Melting Snow on your roof ,prevent damage for your house,It's economical for Infrared heating film for roof heating.It's Simple to install and move.It is easy to clean and portable.we are a professional and leader Chinese exporter of heat film,Customization options(for example: SMT components,flex cable and connectors) can provide the perfect complete solution that can significantly reduce assembly time and increase productivity.Providing a variety of complex shapes design,and different power designs. Membrane in the same piece electrically heated heating circuit can be designed and holding circuit,we are looking forward to your cooperation.
Snow Melting Heat Film For Roof Protection
Roof Heat Film, Snow Melting Heat Film,Snow Melting Pad For Gutters,Snow Melting Salt Replacements Heater
ShenZhen XingHongChang Electric CO., LTD. , https://www.xhc-heater.com