Interface protocols refer to the communication methods and requirements that must be followed when different systems or components exchange information. These protocols cover not only the physical layer of communication but also define the syntax and semantics required for proper data exchange. There are numerous types of interface protocols, each tailored to specific applications and environments.
An embedded system typically consists of an embedded computer system and an execution device. The embedded computer system serves as the core of the entire system and is composed of multiple layers: hardware, middleware, system software, and application software. The execution device, also known as the controlled object, receives control commands from the embedded system to perform specific tasks. This device can range from simple components like a vibration motor in a phone to complex systems such as the Sony Aibo robot dog, which integrates multiple micro-motors and sensors to carry out advanced actions and collect state information.
The hardware layer of an embedded system includes the embedded microprocessor, memory (such as SDRAM, ROM, Flash), general-purpose device interfaces, and I/O interfaces (like A/D, D/A, and digital I/O). Adding power circuits, clock circuits, and memory circuits to the processor forms the embedded core control module. Operating systems and applications can be stored in ROM for faster access and reliability.
**Embedded Common Interface Protocols**
1. **BSD TCP/IP Protocol Stack**
The BSD stack has historically served as the foundation for many commercial TCP/IP stacks. Most professional embedded TCP/IP stacks, such as VxWorks' implementation, are derived from it. This is due to the BSD license, which allows code to be modified or used without paying royalties. Additionally, the BSD stack has been instrumental in developing innovations like congestion control algorithms for wide-area networks.
2. **uC/OS-based uIP**
Developed by Guy Lancaster, uC/IP is an open-source TCP/IP stack designed to work with uC/OS or other operating systems. It is fully free and research-friendly. Its source code is largely based on the open-source BSD and KA9Q stacks. Features include PPP support with authentication and header compression, optimized request/reply interactions, and support for IP, TCP, and UDP. The stack is small, ranging from 30KB to 60KB, making it ideal for resource-constrained systems.
3. **LwIP (Lightweight IP)**
Created by Adam Dunkels at the Swedish Institute of Computer Science, LwIP is an open-source TCP/IP stack designed for embedded systems. It focuses on minimizing RAM usage while maintaining full TCP functionality. It requires only tens of KB of RAM and about 40KB of ROM. LwIP supports multiple network interfaces, ICMP, experimental UDP extensions, and a specialized Raw API for improved performance. It can run independently or be integrated into an OS.
4. **uIP**
uIP is a very small TCP/IP stack designed for 8-bit and 16-bit microcontrollers. It is written entirely in C, making it highly portable across architectures and operating systems. A compiled version can run in just a few kilobytes of ROM or hundreds of bytes of RAM. It also includes an HTTP server for basic web services. It is licensed under the BSD license.
5. **TinyTCP**
TinyTCP is a minimal and simple TCP/IP stack that includes an FTP client. Originally intended for ROM-based deployment, it was designed for big-endian architectures like the 68000. It also includes a basic Ethernet driver for 3COM multi-bus cards.
When choosing an open-source protocol stack, four key factors should be considered: ease of use of the underlying hardware API, compatibility with the operating system, availability of application support, and whether the resource usage is within acceptable limits. While the BSD stack offers full TCP/IP functionality, its large size (70KB–150KB) makes optimization difficult. uIP and TinyTCP are lightweight but lack features needed for high-demand applications like large data transfers. LwIP and uC/IP are similar in functionality and code size, but LwIP is more flexible and does not depend on a specific OS. uC/IP, originally designed for uC/OS, may offer better integration if that OS is already in use.
In terms of community support and documentation, LwIP appears to be more widely adopted and supported online. uC/IP, while powerful, may lack comprehensive documentation and updates. For hobbyists or developers looking to experiment, open-source stacks like LwIP provide excellent examples and are well-suited for prototyping. In my opinion, LwIP should be the first choice due to its active community and extensive resources available online.
Three Phase Online UPS,Tower Online UPS,Rack Mount Online UPS,Isolation Transformer
Shenzhen Unitronic Power System Co., Ltd , https://www.unitronicpower.com